PDA

View Full Version : California - AB1401 - Bill would allow non-citizens serve on jury



Good Times
04-26-2013, 11:38 PM
http://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB1401/id/786019




AB 1401, as introduced, Committee on Judiciary. Jury duty: eligibility. Existing law provides that all persons are eligible and qualified to be prospective trial jurors, except persons who, among other things, are not citizens of the United States, are not residents of the jurisdiction they are summoned to serve, or are not possessed of sufficient knowledge of the English language, as specified. This bill would make technical, non-substantive changes to these provisions.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Section 203 of the Code of Civil Procedure is amended to read: 203.
(a) All persons are eligible and qualified to be prospective trial jurors, except the following:
(1) Persons who are not citizens of the United States.

(2) Persons who are less than 18 years of age.


(3) Persons who are not domiciliaries of the State of California, as determined pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 2020) of Chapter 1 of Division 2 of the Elections Code.

(4) Persons who are not residents of the jurisdiction wherein they are summoned to serve.
(5) Persons who have been convicted of malfeasance in office or a felony, and whose civil rights have not been restored.
(6) Persons who are not possessed of sufficient knowledge of the English language, provided that no person shall be deemed incompetent solely because of the loss of sight or hearing in any degree or other disability which that impedes the person's ability to communicate or which that impairs or interferes with the person's mobility.
(7) Persons who are serving as grand or trial jurors in any court of this state.
(8) Persons who are the subject of conservatorship.

(b) No person shall be excluded from eligibility for jury service in the State of California, for any reason other than those reasons provided by this section.





Name
Yea
Nay
Not Voting
Absent


Asm. Alejo
http://acme.legiscan.com/images/support.png





Asm. Chau
http://acme.legiscan.com/images/support.png





Asm. Dickinson
http://acme.legiscan.com/images/support.png





Asm. Garcia
http://acme.legiscan.com/images/support.png





Asm. Gorell

http://acme.legiscan.com/images/oppose.png




Asm. Maienschein

http://acme.legiscan.com/images/oppose.png




Asm. Muratsuchi
http://acme.legiscan.com/images/support.png





Asm. Stone
http://acme.legiscan.com/images/support.png





Asm. Wagner

http://acme.legiscan.com/images/oppose.png




Asm. Wieckowski
http://acme.legiscan.com/images/support.png






Discuss....

troyboy162
04-27-2013, 03:26 AM
only in California... I love the idea of not having to go to do jury duty as often, but to staff it with people that have no respect for our basic laws seems like a receipt for disaster, or businesses as usual for our idiots.

Seanz0rz
04-27-2013, 09:16 AM
I think I might give up my US citizenship. Seems non citizens get more rights than citizens these days.

Good Times
04-27-2013, 05:18 PM
Makes you wonder what the assembly members were thinking when they voted yes on this eh?

4x4mike
04-27-2013, 08:14 PM
Hopefully this doesn't go anywhere. These bills are rediculous.