PDA

View Full Version : 12V Dual Cylinder Air Compressor Review



Robinhood4x4
10-24-2009, 05:31 PM
For the past 7 years I've been using 2 Cadillac compressors (http://robinhood4x4.com/compressors.htm) with great success for my on board air, however since they're bolted to my 2nd gen 4runner, they're not exactly portable. With the acquisition of a 4th gen 4runner I needed another way to fill tires, float tubes, and air mattresses. As luck would have it, a
thread (http://www.ultimateyota.com/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemid=26&topic=8310.msg78552) popped up here showing a link to a dual cylinder compressor with a great low price of $60. After doing some research it appears this compressor is the same as the Q-89 compressor which usually sells for at least twice the price and has the added bonus of not being hideously chromed out.

It comes with everything you see here:
http://www.robinhood4x4.com/UY/Compressor/CompEverything.JPG

It's not too big with an overall size of 9"L x 5.5"W x 7.5"H (with handled folded down):
http://www.robinhood4x4.com/UY/Compressor/Compside.JPG

The top has a handy dandy compartment to store the little accesories that comes with it:
http://www.robinhood4x4.com/UY/Compressor/CompTop.JPG

Here's the gauge which actually seemed to read a little low with the compressor off and a little more accurate with it on.
http://www.robinhood4x4.com/UY/Compressor/CompGauge.JPG

Here's the label on the front:
http://www.robinhood4x4.com/UY/Compressor/CompLabel.JPG

Now on to the good stuff. I tested the compressor with a 33x10.5 R15 BFG Mud Terrain and a P265/65R17 Bridgestone Dueler which is the stock tire on the 4th gen.
http://www.robinhood4x4.com/UY/Compressor/CompTire.JPG

You'll notice in the above picture I have a thermocouple at the top of one of the cylinders to measure temperature, however, I discovered this location was fairly cool compared to other places. In subsequent test runs the TC was moved to the bottom of the cylinder shown in a picture below.

Pressure testing was done from absolute flat (0 PSI) to approximately 33-35 PSI for both tire sizes. At 1 minute time intervals I would shut off the compressor and the timer, remove the connector from the valve stem and measure pressure with my more accurate pressure gauge. The gauges I use are accurate to +-2% of full range. Once pressure readings were taken, I would reconnect the compressor and resume the test. A little bit of air would leak out when disconnecting and connecting the compressor, but the amount was insignificant compared to the volume of the tires.

Pressure test results:
http://www.robinhood4x4.com/UY/Compressor/CompGraph1.jpg

The results were surprisingly linear in this range but I guess this is to be expected with a compressor that can go up to 150 PSI. Since I took pressure readings throughout the test, one can calculate the amount of time it takes to fill the tires from any point along the curve to any other point along the curve.

33x10.5 R15 BFG
0 PSI to 35 PSI = 6 min
10 PSI to 35 PSI = 4 min 20 sec
10 PSI to 32 PSI = 3 min 42 sec

P265/65R17 Bridgestone
0 PSI to 35 PSI = 4 min 9 sec
10 PSI to 35 PSI = 2 min 57 sec
10 PSI to 32 PSI = 2 min 48 sec

Another test I did was the temperature of the compressor. The temperature readings for the graph were taken just below the red portion of the finned cylinder in the black area.
http://www.robinhood4x4.com/UY/Compressor/CompGraph2.jpg

Interestingly this was not the hottest part of the compressor. The metal fitting at the manifold was the hottest, followed by the quick disconnect connector.

This picture shows the temperature locations:
http://www.robinhood4x4.com/UY/Compressor/CompBackL.JPG

For the 4 minute, bridgestone run, these locations got up to:
Connector = 138 deg F
Hose = 116 deg F
Manifold = 170 deg F

During 2 consecutive runs of the BFG, the connector got up to 154 deg F. The lesson here is to be careful of the hose and connector during filling.

Overall, I think this compressor is a good one and seems well made. I can't fault any of the construction quality except maybe the plastic base but that makes it lighter and it should last. The switch and fuse are a bit large and clunky but user friendly. The motor sounded strong and healthy even when starting up at 30ish PSI and didn't bog down at all. Looking at the box and manual I couldn't find any mention of a manufacturer or even the name of the compressor. There is a picture of a Prado on the box however, so that indicates it's from overseas somewhere, needless to say.

I happened to find a coupon code over at www.toyota120.com (http://www.toyota120.com) while www.overlandwarehouse.com (http://www.overlandwarehouse.com) was doing an October promotion. This brought the price down to $50 plus shipping. They're still working out some bugs with the store website and they accidentally charged me sales tax but they should clear this up shortly. Shipping was fast and email response was also fast.

The following was added 10-25-09:
Ok I repeated the tests with the engine running and here are the results. Note that the lines shown are the trendlines only, not the connected dots lines. This was done for simplicity of viewing the graph.
http://www.robinhood4x4.com/UY/Compressor/CompGraph3.jpg

This graph is much more cluttered because it shows the following test conditions:
-Engine off, 33x10.5
-10 to 35 PSI = 4 min 20 sec

-Engine off, P265/65
-10 to 35 PSI = 2 min 57 sec

-3.0 Engine running, 33x10.5
-10 to 35 PSI = 3 min 33 sec

-3.0 Engine running, P265/65
-10 to 35 PSI = 2 min 54 sec

-4.0 Engine running, P265/65
-10 to 35 PSI = 2 min 43 sec

As you can see, with the engine running the fill times did reduce but it depended greatly on the tire size and which engine powered the compressor.

I was skeptical of the data for the "Engine running, 33x10.5" because it was so much faster than with the engine off, so I repeated the engine running test 3 times. Each test was nearly identical so the data must be valid. The only explanation I can think of is there are diminishing returns on smaller tires.

Here's some new temperature readings done after 3 consecutive tire fills:

Connector = 176 deg F
Hose = 125 deg F
Cylinder = 161 deg F
Manifold = 179 deg F


Keywords: MV50, MV-50, Q89, Q-89, Q Industries MF1089 MasterFlow Twin Air Compressor, superflow.

CJM
10-24-2009, 05:47 PM
Can this possibly accept a regular air fitting?

Robinhood4x4
10-24-2009, 05:50 PM
You can probably cut off the quick disconnect fitting and use a barb type fitting.

I think I'm going to rerun these tests tomorrow with the engine running to see if the increased voltage will help speed it up.

CJM
10-24-2009, 07:41 PM
Ya know funny thing, but I bought an mv50 from pepboys for one of our work trucks, the dang thing had a regular fitting on it.

Havent found one like it since.

troyboy162
10-25-2009, 06:13 AM
You can probably cut off the quick disconnect fitting and use a barb type fitting.

I think I'm going to rerun these tests tomorrow with the engine running to see if the increased voltage will help speed it up.

very nice write up! looking forward to seeing what your engine on air times will be. my mv-50 gains a audible increase in rpm's when the engine in on. i think at the least this is as good as a mv-50 with the benefit of lower temps and redundancy for the event of one cylinder failing

edit: the 1.54cfm seems odd. mv-50's are rated for 2.54 and your times seem on par with that

L33T35T Tacoma
10-25-2009, 11:43 AM
I was going to mention the same thing: retest with engine running. My compressors
move a lot faster with the engine running.

Obi..
10-25-2009, 03:15 PM
*Thought about integrating a storage tank or plumbing up some of that square tubing on the rear bumper? Not much but a thought none the less.

Robinhood4x4
10-25-2009, 03:40 PM
Ok, I added the new data. Check my math, make sure I didn't make a mistake somewhere.

Troy, I wouldn't trust what the manufacturer claims is the CFM. Who knows how they tested it or what marketing did to the numbers.

troyboy162
10-25-2009, 03:54 PM
man i think i gotta pull the trigger on this one. the lower heat and form factor are swaying me. thank you for the review

Robinhood4x4
10-25-2009, 03:59 PM
How hot does the other one get? This one still gets too hot to touch. Oh, and I took new temp readings after 3 consecutive tire fills. Give me a minute and I'll add it to the original post.

troyboy162
10-25-2009, 04:19 PM
How hot does the other one get? This one still gets too hot to touch. Oh, and I took new temp readings after 3 consecutive tire fills. Give me a minute and I'll add it to the original post.
not sure but i cant touch the thing half the time after im done. i need to give it a minute and then its the "lightning hands" to disconnect it. 176 seems like you could grab it but it would be uncomfortable. the mv-50 will burn you if you linger longer then a touch

Robinhood4x4
10-25-2009, 06:49 PM
I don't know, it seemed pretty hot to me but I didn't try to disconnect it.

bulldog
10-28-2009, 02:26 PM
Steve, great technical review. Thanks for doing it. Also thanks for pointing out the issue on the website, it is now resolved, and we always welcome feedback.

A little background.

We got the dual cylinder compressors instead of the the single cylinder MV-50 type (both are available from the same distributor overseas). The dual cylinder is actually a bit more expensive to procure than the single cylinder, but we believed it to be well worth it for the following reasons:

MV-50 type is rated at 72 l/min vs dual cylinder was rated at 84 l/min from the same supplier (17% better)
The dual cylinder runs quieter and cooler on each cylinder, with less vibration.
The connector is off the cylinders itself, making for much lower temperatures at the connector (though it can still get hot eventually)
The pressure gauge was closer to the tire allowing relatively accurate readings while filling the tire, saving time and guess work. This was not the case with the compressors with the gauge at the cylinder we tested.

I did a side by side test with the MV-50 vs the dual cylinder on 265/65/17 tires filling them from 16 to 32PSI (pretty normal pressure for most tires in that size). The dual cylinder was able to do it in less than 2 minutes (1:55), while the MV50 took 2min 35s. I prefer side by side testing as it eliminates variables like ambient temperature, elevation, operating voltage, tire size, etc, etc. Obviously there will be tolerances between units, so exact results will vary, but I would expect the dual cylinder to provide better performance than the single cylinder unit (at least at the manufacturers claimed rate).

At any rate would be interested to see further results and impressions. We tried to bring a better unit (at least in our opinion :D) to market for a competitive price to a very popular choice for a lot of wheelers.

troyboy162
10-28-2009, 03:18 PM
sweet! ordered and couldnt pass up your tree strap

Robinhood4x4
10-28-2009, 08:09 PM
I did a side by side test with the MV-50 vs the dual cylinder on 265/65/17 tires filling them from 16 to 32PSI (pretty normal pressure for most tires in that size). The dual cylinder was able to do it in less than 2 minutes (1:55), while the MV50 took 2min 35s.


This matches up perfectly with my results as well, for that size tire. It took 1.89 minutes to reach 16psi and 3.79 minutes to reach 32psi. Therefore, it took 1.89 minutes (1m 53s)to go from 16 to 32 psi. Good to see our results match up which further validates your MV50 data.

I was impressed the gauge worked as well as it did when flowing air.

expatoz
10-30-2009, 03:24 PM
Thanks for the orders guys. Sorry about the darn software glitch but Andries has jumped on that and it's resolved now.

Unfortunately we have only 1 (one) compressor left in stock (been a very popular item) and the promo ends 31st October. Our next stock will not be available until December but just in time for Christmas LOL.

Once again, apologies for the tax glitch and thanks for the very informative write-up

Regards
Mark

Crinale
10-31-2009, 12:55 AM
damn... only one left? guess i have to wait til xmas...

bulldog
01-15-2010, 03:52 PM
Just a heads up guys we got our new inventory in of the compact dual cylinder and the heavy duty compressor. Apologies for the delays.

Make sure to grab yours as they seem to be very popular.